Hello aman, and thank you for your message.
If I understand your message correctly, the purpose of your grant application is to categorise DAO members in order to provide them with a service or reasons to become more involved in DAO ParaSwap.
I agree with you on one point, I think we’re all looking to grow the DAO membership and get people involved in the governance and overall life of the DAO.
Particularly at a time when the market is “complicated” and there are fewer of us overall in crypto than there were a few months ago.
My point of divergence is that your methods serve to categorise people and separate them into groups and then create initiatives to keep them.
Personally, and believing in the ParaSwap project, I think we need to do the opposite, bring people together rather than compartmentalising them.
Attract people from all walks of life around ParaSwap, its performance and social escrow. Make PSP2.0 a natural choice for users from all backgrounds, and avoid having to satisfy a particular need in order to attract and retain people.
I also agree with you about the need to know and listen to the community, but I prefer to let people express their needs on the discord or the governance forum rather than analysing and categorising them (even if this transparency is the beauty of blockchain!).
You’ll understand that I’m not personally attracted to your proposal at first sight. I’ll leave it to the other members of the community to express their feelings.
Thanks again for your message!