Thank you for addressing our questions and concerns @ArtemOAK! Replying below:
Looking at this and the other example provided, I think the price tag is far too steep and not something the DAO should be paying a whole lot. In my view, I would consider this relatively basic descriptive content, which can be done fairly easily with some AI and editing. In my experience there is absolutely no need to be paying 2.5k a piece for this sort of articles.
Why do you think Paraswap should be the one paying for this comparative report? To have any credibility, the report would have to be neutral and objective.
If you’d consider halving the ETH ask and a delegation rather than PSP payment, we’d be more open to support this proposal.