PSP-IPΔ7: Dynamic staking incentives

This one is hard to disagree with as a staker. Only thing I’d say is that I’d like for some form of Re-delegation feature before this is implemented, as mentioned here PSP Re-Delegation Feature - #5 by Tenzent .

Without a smoother re-delegation experience for stakers, many might keep ‘betting on the same horse’ just as sheer obligation from losing rewards and gas costs.

No disagreements here, we have to reward the ParaSwap edge!

I like the idea of this, but I am not knowledgeable enough about market performance to give a rough estimate of what I think the ratio should be for MMSoV.

Just wondering though, was this increase planned to be linear? I don’t actually know the answer here, but I wonder if a nonlinear distribution could make things better.

Nothing to say here, just agreed! I assume the metrics of performance per chain will be clearly shown? That could also incentivise stakers to support MMs that work on chains they like more, even if they dont perform as well.

3 Likes