UPDATED PIP-48 - DAO wallets update
Abstract
The DAO treasury will evolve with PIP-45: Enable ParaSwap Foundation to facilitate $ARB and $OP incentives , removing the ability to use these two assets to fund initiatives.
So I set out to take stock of the DAO’s treasury, thinking that everything would be in the “one” multisig indicated in the documentation. Unfortunately, the assets in the wallet are incomplete.
Let me reassure you right away: all the funds are clearly identifiable and can be found on public addresses available in the documentation here and here .
Transparency is assured, but simplicity of access to this information is less so: what does DAO own?
Here is a breakdown of said wallets / contracts:
Identification | Wallet / Contract | Purpose | Chain | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
Year 1 vesting contract | 0x6a3CCa09b1C2B83834124c8646a68b9Bad2a07b9 | Vesting contract | Ethereum | To claim by DAO wallet |
Year 2 vesting contract | 0x348aa814a72970e76d5756a2cda16e7e8f245aab | Vesting contract | Ethereum | To claim by DAO wallet |
Year 3 vesting contract | 0xb074094d2e858b25d129989644248f9f6946e081 | Vesting contract | Ethereum | Start claiming each month from february 2024 |
Year 4 vesting contract | 0x51d2f2c65d043118eb4329fcbc738943f494609f | Vesting contract | Ethereum | Start claiming each month from february 2025 |
Main multisig | 0x5a61d9214adefd7669428a03a4e8734a00e9f464 | DAO Wallet | Ethereum | Become the main DAO wallet |
Operational multisig | 0x6DF5e7b236a4F14e08C27E09202B4d1865905e9b | DAO Wallet | Ethereum | |
Main multisig | 0xfe98240ddAEDF78E278C28F1EdD690ee1a774e66 | DAO Wallet | Arbitrum | Empty after PIP-45 application |
Fee claimer | 0x619BBf92Fd6bA59893327676B2685A3762a49a33 | DAO Wallet Fee Claimer | Ethereum | From fee claimer contract: 0xeF13101C5bbD737cFb2bF00Bbd38c626AD6952F7 |
Fee claimer | 0x7dA82E75BE36Ab9625B1dd40A5aE5181b43473f3 | DAO Wallet Fee Claimer | Arbitrum | From fee claimer contract: 0xA7465CCD97899edcf11C56D2d26B49125674e45F |
Fee claimer | 0xAFFdeC0FE0B5BBfd725642D87D14c465d25F8dE8 | DAO Wallet Fee Claimer | Avalanche | From fee claimer contract: 0xbFcd68FD74B4B458961495F3392Bf96f46A29E67 |
Fee claimer | 0x8c1a1D0b6286F35d47a676aB78482f1cf3D749dC | DAO Wallet Fee Claimer | BNB | From fee claimer contract: 0x2DF17455B96Dde3618FD6B1C3a9AA06D6aB89347 |
Fee claimer | 0x5487683dc3216655D0C8AA31255e2e313b99B477 | DAO Wallet Fee Claimer | Fantom | From fee claimer contract: 0x4F14fE8c86A00D6DFB9e91239738499Fc0F587De |
Fee claimer | 0xf93A7F819F83DBfDbC307d4D4f0FE5a208C50318 | DAO Wallet Fee Claimer | Optimism | From fee claimer contract: 0xA7465CCD97899edcf11C56D2d26B49125674e45F |
Fee claimer | 0xABF832105D7D19E5DEC28D014d5a12579dfa1097 | DAO Wallet Fee Claimer | Polygon | From fee claimer contract: 0x8b5cF413214CA9348F047D1aF402Db1b4E96c060 |
Fee claimer | DAO Wallet Fee Claimer | PolygonZKEVM | To be created / communicated / integrated with mimic? | |
Fee claimer | DAO Wallet Fee Claimer | Base | To be created / communicated / integrated with mimic? |
Note that wallet for PolygonzkEVM and Base are still to be displayed in the doc.
Identified assets present on wallets other than the DAO’s main Multisig are:
- $PSP in vesting contracts
Some $PSP in the vesting contract are claimable, but not claimed and still in the contract.
Consequences = circulating supply undervalued, can be a deterrent for potential investors + difficulty in identifying DAO’s treasury position. - WETH from staking rewards going to the DAO
Consequence = difficulty in identifying DAO’s treasury position.
Goals & review
The aim here is not to do treasury management, in the sense that this proposal is not intended to use this or that asset.
The sole purpose of this proposal is to reorganise the assets available in the DAO’s public wallets into the wallet that is identified to hold the DAO’s treasury.
Potentially negative points to this proposal:
- aggregating assets in a single wallet may increase the risk in the event of a hack. fragmenting liquidity as today avoids a single point of failure. even if it makes reading the DAO’s treasury complicated.
- moving these assets will inevitably entail significant work for multisig signatories.
Further analysis may be required to identify whether other assets are eligible for this transfer.
Means
Claim vesting contract as follow:
Year 1 & 2
- Harvest all remaining tokens first week of jan 2024 (83M + 200M $PSP)
Year 3
- Q1 2024 harvest first week of april 2024 (50M $PSP)
- Q2 2024 harvest first week of july 2024 (50M $PSP)
- Q3 2024 harvest first week of oct 2024 (50M $PSP)
- Q4 2024 harvest first week of jan 2025 (50M $PSP)
Year 4
- Q1 2025 harvest first week of april 2025 (50M $PSP)
- Q2 2025 harvest first week of july 2025 (50M $PSP)
- Q3 2025 harvest first week of oct 2025 (50M $PSP)
- Q4 2025 harvest first week of jan 2026 (50M $PSP)
Bridge and transfer assets to the main multisig:
- Bridge/transfer WETH & PSP from fee claimer DAO wallets to the main multisig (except from the mainnet and optimism ones)
- Harvest the staking rewards from the mainnet fee claimer to the main multisig on the same dates as the vesting claims
Implementation Overview
This proposal, if accepted, will trigger the transfer and/or claim of assets to the DAO main multisig, doing so, it will clarify the DAO’s treasury state, but also the metrics of the $PSP token (updated circulating supply).
This is outside the scope of the DAO, but the use of a bot relaying transactions from DAO wallets in a specific channel would be a plus in my opinion.
Voting option
- Claim $PSP and regroup assets to the main multisig
- Claim $PSP but do NOT regroup to the main multisig
- Do nothing
- Abstain